![]() ![]() In fact, this letter presented Paul’s Gentile gospel in Jewish terms in the prospect of his travel to Jerusalem. However, a close intertextual analysis of Lk 3:7d-11 reveals that it contains a number of typically Pauline ideas, which were in an almost consistently sequential way borrowed from the Letter to the Romans. Consequently, this text seems to be one of the best candidates for the reconstructed, purportedly Galilean ‘Q material’, which was allegedly almost verbatim copied in this fragment by both Matthew and Luke. The level of verbal agreement between Mt 3:7d-10 and Lk 3:7d-9 is extremely high. Lk 3:7d-9 is usually regarded as one of the least controversially identified fragments of the so-called Q Source. Program Unit: Allusions in the Gospels and Acts The Allusive Use of Romans in Luke 3:7-11 Moreover, it offers an adequate literary solution to the well-known exegetical problem of the Lucan dating of the census under Quirinius (Lk 2:2) to the time of Herod, the king of Judaea (Lk 1:5). This intertextual approach provides explanations for several surprising features of the Lucan text, such as the presentation of Nazareth as a city (Lk 1:26). A close intertextual analysis of this section against the background of Paul’s letters reveals that it in fact contains a number of Pauline ideas and motifs, which were creatively reworked and sequentially used by the evangelist. Scholars therefore wonder what the origin of this material could be: oral traditions, some written sources, or simply the evangelist’s literary creativity. The Lucan Infancy Narrative (Lk 1-2) contains material which evidently does not originate from the Gospel of Mark. Pauline Ideas Explaining the Census under Quirinius in Luke 1–2 This inference has important consequences for the sources and the dating of the Book of Numbers. Accordingly, it seems that the shorter traditional apotropaic text, which was witnessed at Ketef Hinnom, was reworked into the elaborate Levitical blessing in Num 6:24-26 under the influence of Deut 18:2. ![]() However, an intertextual analysis of the Book of Numbers in its sequentially organized literary relationship to Deuteronomy reveals that the tripartite Aaronic blessing (Num 6:24-26), together with its context (Num 6:23.27), stresses the importance of the name of Yahweh, as Yahweh said to Aaron, thus illustrating the main idea of the structurally corresponding text concerning the importance of the name of Yahweh for the Levites (Deut 18:2). Most scholars assume that the longer biblical text was the source for the shorter text which is contained on the scrolls (esp. The discovery of the Ketef Hinnom silver scrolls raised the problem of their relationship to the scriptural text of the Aaronic blessing (Num 6:24-26). Ketef Hinnom and Numbers 6:24-26: The Direction and Reasons for Reworkingīartosz Adamczewski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw 2015 International Meeting Buenos Aires, Argentina
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |